What is hidden behind love at first sight?

Everyone has their other half. "How does she fall for him, or how does he fall for her?" The four categories of love that convey information visually revealed in this article seek to explain one thing - how one person "sees" another person. The book "Why Fall in Love with the One You Love" attributes lovers who fall in love at first sight to three types of physiognomy: harmonious physiognomy, responsive physiognomy, affinity physiognomy and integrated physiognomy. The 4 visual love categories apply to everyone, young or old, slim or plump, beautiful or average.

The first type: harmonious face-proportion

Representative figures: Prince Charles and Princess Diana.

Two people with similar facial proportions have harmonious faces.

There are three sets of data on their faces that are roughly the same: the height of the forehead, the length of the philtrum, and the length of the jaw. This is a mathematical fuzzy match of appearance types. Two people with roughly the same three sets of data will have similar facial contour proportions, which is determined by the shape of their skulls. However, it should be noted that these couples or lovers with harmonious facial features do not look alike. Unless they have a responsive face in addition to a harmonious face

The second type: responsive face - shape

Representative figures: Beckham and Victoria.

Two people with responsive physiognomy will look a lot like each other. This is what people often call "husband and wife look alike."

The reason they look so much like each other is because there are three important parts of their faces that are shaped alike. These three important parts refer to the upper eyelid line (the line where the upper eyelashes grow, which is usually where "eyeliner" is used), the upper lip line (the curve at the edge of the pink lips, which is also one of the places where "lip liner" is used, and men usually use it next to the "beard zone"), and the eyebrows (for eyebrows, what is important is not the upper line or the lower line, but its overall shape or the range of curvature and extension, which is usually called "eyebrow shape").

The third type: Kinship-type face - close relatives

Representative figures: Mona Lisa and Leonardo da Vinci

The affinity type of physiognomy is very different from the above two types. This type of physiognomy is not based on the similarity of facial features of both parties, but on the feeling of one party towards the other party. It is one-way.

This one-way feeling has little to do with the other person's appearance, but it is the other person's appearance and behavior that evoke a memory full of intimacy. For example, two strangers meet, and A feels that B is very similar to one of his closest relatives, so he is attracted to him. Moreover, the concept of "relatives" here is not entirely based on blood relationship, but the first person of the opposite sex with whom A develops an intimate relationship. A couple with affable physiognomy always starts with one person being deeply attracted to the other and longing for his or her love. Moreover, the loved one often does not feel the same level of attraction at first. A woman who is loved may eventually be conquered by this feeling, but it is more difficult for a man.

The fourth type: integrated face - has all the characteristics of the above three categories

Representative figures: Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.

Can a couple have all three of the above facial features at the same time? The answer is yes. For example, if a man's lover looks very much like his closest relative (such as his mother), then the two people have a kinship-type physiognomy. If they have both harmonious and responsive features, they are very lucky to have three different categories of love features. Of course, the "closest relative" involved in the kinship-type physiognomy here is not necessarily the mother, but there are many possibilities.

Based on the latest findings of modern academic research on "sexual behavior", the new interpretation of the concept of "closest relatives" may expand the connotation of the concept of "having it all".